R.K. Call v. Parkhill

R.K. Call v. Parkhill

Lower Court

  • Leon County


  • 1844


  • 3


  • 32


of all & singular the lands tenements & effects of the said estate levied on & sold by virtue of the executors as the suit of Richard K. Call vs. said Parkhill admx And he thereupon gives the Court to understand that the said Martha Ann Manley is not the proper representative of said Estate. That no security whatever remains for the faithful [?] said Martha Ann Manly for any act or acts done or to be done by her since the said order of [?], & that to restore the said property & effects to said Martha Ann Manley would be in [?] of the rights of your petitioner & [?] of the interest of the numerous creditors of said estate & he therefore prays that said Writ of Restitution be not awarded.

And as in duty bound will ever pray

Thompson & Hagner Attorneys of John S. Gamble

[?] Petitioner

Feby 18[th]